Nothing is ever as easy as it seems, particularly in networking. We had some recent proof of that this week as RAD announced a bit more about its “Distributed NFV” concept. On the one hand, “classical NFV” says that you want to remove functions from devices and host them in servers. RAD says that’s not…
Common Thread in the SDN/NFV Tapestry?
We’re in the throes of one show involving SDN and NFV and in less than 2 weeks, the SDN World Congress event where NFV was launched in the first place will be underway. It’s not surprising we’re getting a lot of SDN and NFV action, so let’s take a look at some of the main…
Who Will Orchestrate the Orchestrators?
Most people would agree that NFV crosses over a lot of subtle technology boundaries. It’s clearly something that could (and IMHO likely would in most cases) be hosted in the cloud. It’s something that is certain to consume SDN if there’s any appreciable SDN deployment, and it’s something whose principles of orchestration and management are…
SDN: Growth or Just Changes
The world of SDN continues to evolve, and as is usually the case many of the evolutions have real utility. The challenge continues to be the conceptualization of a flexible new network framework that exploits what SDN can do, and at an even more basic level provide the framework by which the different SDN models…
Finding the True Soul of SDN
Cisco’s announcements on Network Convergence System (NCS) follow their normal pattern that’s fairly characterized as “chicken-little” sales stimulation. The network sky is falling because everyone and everything is going to be connected and demanding their bits be transported. Suck it up, operators, and start spending! Underneath this opportunism is a reality, though, which is that…
Selling the Future for a Hot Dog?
In mid-October the SDN World Congress marks the anniversary of the first NFV white paper’s publication. SDN is far older than that, and the cloud is older still. I attended a cloud conference last week, and while it was interesting and even insightful in spots, it’s pretty clear that we’re still missing a big part…
Can We Realize AT&T’s Domain 2.0 Goals?
AT&T made some news by announcing its latest Supplier Domain Program, based on the goal of developing a transformative SDN/NFV architecture for the network. The company is pledging to begin to buy under the program late this year and into 2014 but has not issued any capex updates. That tells me that they expect the…
Can Blackberry be the Next “Private Phoenix?”
Well, the story now is that Blackberry is following Dell’s example and going private. Certainly there are simple financial reasons for that, but I also have to wonder whether some of the same “SOX-think” I talked about with Dell be operating here too. If there’s a turnaround in play for Blackberry it’s going to be…
Can Dell Turn “Private” into “Leader?”
No less investment maven than Carl Icahn believes that Michael Dell’s successful campaign to stave off his takeover and take Dell private was “just one recent example of a ridiculously dysfunctional system. Lacking strategic foresight, the Dell board for years presided over the loss of tens of billions of dollars in market value at the…
Why Not “Software-Defined Software?”
We have software defined networks, software defined data centers, software defined servers. What’s missing? I contend it’s the most obvious thing of all; software designed software. We’ve built a notion of virtualization and agility at the resource level, but we’re forgetting that all of the stuff we’re proposing is being purchased to run software. If…